A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a

A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights when respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing during the present case. In these types of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

Delay in recording confessional statement might not be treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not utilize, given that the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, somewhat he continues to be acquitted on the criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually perfectly-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this pretty charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition continues to be set at naught through the Supreme Court of Pakistan within the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.

maintaining the conviction awarded for the appellant reduce the sentence with the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

The explained recovery may be used, with the most, for corroboration on the main evidence, but by itself it cannot certainly be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The stated memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as very little was discovered on account of these types of pointation. The place of prevalence in addition to the place of throwing the dead body were already within the knowledge of witnesses before their pointation with the petitioners. Reliance is additionally placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:

This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to really make it suitable towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

only to the ground of miscases remanded & only within the ground of misreading of evidence only over the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

Electronic and paper court records retained in the court site can be viewed with the courthouse for free, however there can be a payment of ten cents for each page to print from a public access terminal.

Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law, is often a law that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, fairly than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this more info kind of ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.

Hence, it had been held that the right to your healthy environment was part from the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 with the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all sides of human existence, all this kind of amenities and services that a person is entitled to enjoy with dignity, legally and constitutionally.

This article delves into the intricacies with the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to deliver an extensive understanding of its implications and functional applications.

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right into a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions during the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it's important that the case proven the application with the precautionary principle where there is actually a menace to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations of the State in protecting the right to the clean and healthy environment.

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.